Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Escapist logo header image

Swedish Courts: Imaginary Children Arenā€™t Real

This article is over 12 years old and may contain outdated information
image

The Swedish Supreme Court has acquitted manga translator, Simon Lundstrƶm.

Lundstrƶm was convicted of possessing child pornography back in 2010, when authorities found suggestive pictures of bobble-headed, cartoon minors on his personal computer. He disputed the ruling, arguing that you need children for child pornography and that drawings arenā€™t children, but his conviction was upheld by two lower courts, one of which reduced his punishment to a $780 fine and an order that he could no longer offer his services as a ā€œmanga expert.ā€

In both trials, the prosecution argued that the images Lundstrƶm possessed could be used to entice children into performing sexual acts, and that real children could have been used as models for the drawings. Iā€™m going to assume that last argument sounded marginally less insane in the original Swedish.

Though the Supreme court insisted that the 39 images Lundstrƶm was being charged for did constitute pornographic representations of children, it was forced to admit that there is a distinction between fictional children and their aggravating, real-life counterparts. It also claimed one of the images was realistic enough to constitute full blown child pornography, but admitted that prosecuting Lundstrƶm on those grounds would violate his freedom of expression.

ā€œThe criminalization of possession of the drawings would otherwise exceed what is necessary with regard to the purpose which has led to the restriction on freedom of expression and freedom of information,ā€ read a statement from the court.

Lundstrƶm later released a statement to the press:

ā€œIā€™m obviously very relieved, in part because it makes life easier for me personally, but most of all Iā€™m generally relieved for Sweden as a whole,ā€ he said. It would have been very hard for me to relate to Sweden as a country if it turned out to be a place that prohibited certain expressions of the imagination.ā€

Source: SMP thanks to awesomeClaw

Recommended Videos

The Escapist is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy