Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Escapist logo header image

GameStop CEO Says Restricting Used Game Sales Is Bad For Everyone

This article is over 16 years old and may contain outdated information
image

GameStop CEO Dan DeMatteo says the industry crackdown on used game sales actually has a negative impact on new releases as well, as customers can no longer use the “residual value” of their old games to help them afford new ones.

Despite the nearly-universal negative reaction from consumers, many leading figures in the videogame industry have made no secret of the fact that they are trying to find ways to curtail the pre-owned market. Epic President Michael Capps recently equated the legal sale of used games with piracy, while in July Microsoft’s Alvin Gendrano said the advent of downloadable content could be used to help “defend against the used games market.” Install limits built into games like Spore, meanwhile, effectively render the games worthless for anyone but the original buyer.

But for specialty retailers like GameStop, pre-owned game sales represent a significant profit opportunity, particularly in the current economic climate, and according to DeMatteo, the industry attitude toward game sales is becoming a problem for both sellers and buyers. The high prices of many new games tends to mask the fact that profit margins are minimal, and it’s not unreasonable to conclude that if game retailers are forced to carry new games only, their selection will be cut considerably as they focus exclusively on games that are sure-fire moneymakers.

“I think it creates contention not only for us, yes, but also for the consumer,” he said in a recent interview with Gamasutra. “Anything that limits the transferability of a game from consumer to a friend of theirs, to selling it on eBay, to exchanging it and trading it with one of their friends, or selling it back to GameStop — I think is a bone of contention with the consumer.”

Rather than harming new game sales, DeMatteo claimed that new game sales grow alongside trade-ins, as consumers use the “residual value” of their old games to help purchase new ones. “The consumer has been trained that there is a residual value to their video games,” he said, adding that that value to customers is typically held at around $20 per game.

“We will give out approximately $800 million in credits this year – trade-in credits that will go toward the purchase of new video games,” he said. “The consumer, oftentimes and especially now, needs that residual value from those games as a trade-in to be able to afford a new video game.” He also implied that publishers could find themselves without the good graces of the biggest game retailer in North America, warning that if they continue to fight used game sales, it will “eventually get the customer upset, as well as GameStop.”

Recommended Videos

The Escapist is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission.Ā Learn more about our Affiliate Policy