Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Escapist logo header image

Manga Translator Appeals Child Pornography Charges

This article is over 12 years old and may contain outdated information
image

According to the Swedish courts, cartoon characters are people too.

Manga translating Swede, Simon Lundström, was convicted of possessing child pornography back in 2010, despite the fact the “manga images” used to convict him featured no real children. Sweden’s Court of Appeals upheld its conviction against him after an appeal back in January of 2011, but lowered the amount of images he was to be prosecuted for from 59 to 39. The punishment Lundström faces is relatively minor – a fine of around $780 following his appeal – but the conviction still marks him as a sex offender. He did lose his job translating for publisher, Bonnier Carlsen, after has was convicted. The court verdict also states that he can no longer offer his services as a “manga expert.”

For those of you who love picking up random terms you will never use in casual conversation: “Lolicon,” a portmanteau of the phrase “Lolita Complex,” is used to refer to manga that depict characters with childlike characteristics, often in an erotic manner.

“These are not real people,” said University of Gävle comics researcher, Johan Höjer, during the initial trial. “The prosecution has a tendency to view these drawings as camouflaged photos, but these are animated fantasies.”

The prosecution, however, argued that the images could be used to entice children into performing sexual acts, and even went as far as to suggest the artists involved in the work could have used real children as models.

“And even a drawing could be of a real child,” said prosecutor, Hedvig Trost. “A photo depicting a real child could have been used to make the drawing. It is hard from the outside to know whether there is an original photo or not.”

The Swedish courts are still struggling with the question of whether or not lines on paper technically count as children – evidently they don’t agree with Magritte’s view on the matter – but Trost’s argument is ridiculous. Director, John McTiernan, could have perfected Die Hard’s gritty, yet realistic, action scenes by mercilessly gunning down hobos as research – yet the Swedish police force have yet to arrest Bruce Willis as an accessory to murder.

The Supreme Court will announce its verdict in “a few weeks.” In the meantime, a criminal inspector working for Sweden’s National Bureau of Investigation’s child pornography unit has written a piece for the Svenska Dagbladet newspaper. In it, he argues that the images should not be considered pornography and added that he was “doubtful of how a conviction would benefit those children who are actually suffering from real abuse which is being documented.”

Source: The Local

Recommended Videos

The Escapist is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy