Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

CEO: Dotcom’s Mega Isn’t A Piracy Enabler

This article is over 11 years old and may contain outdated information

Vikram Kumar wants to make sure everyone understands what Kim Dotcom’s new file sharer is all about.

“The segment that seems to be most interested in Mega, and in paying for space, security and privacy tends to be professionals,” says Vikram Kumar, CEO of Kim Dotcom’s Mega, speaking via Skype at a London Copyright and Technology conference. Dotcom’s previous enterprise, Megaupload, was raided at the urging of the FBI – an action that the courts later ruled was illegal – and the fallout was so intense that New Zealand’s PM was forced to apologize. Dotcom’s still embroiled in legal entanglements as a result of that copyright infringement allegation, and his potential extradition to the US to face charges is unresolved. But Mega is definitely not a piracy service, and its CEO is keen to make sure that everyone understands that.

In essence, says Kumar, Mega is a faster and more secure Dropbox. It still attracts attention; about 2 to 3 million files are uploaded to Mega every day, and it gets around 100 takedown notices for alleged copyright infringement each day too. But, Kumar points out, that’s nothing compared to other services. YouTube, for example, gets 15 million takedown notices each month, or about half a million per day. “The numbers tell us that Mega is not being used for wide-scale copyright infringement,” says Kumar.

Mega’s also keen to ensure that external search engines don’t provide indexes of Mega content. If they did, then potentially outsiders could use Mega as a copyright infringement service; Mega insists on public sharing of decryption keys for content, but a private index could bypass that rule. Kumar doesn’t want those sites out there, and if they use the Mega name in any way that suggests the index is linked to the company, Mega will take action for trademark violation or fraud.

Nor will Mega allow streaming music or films, even if the one doing it is the copyright owner. “That’s not Mega’s purpose,” says Kumar, possibly with one eye on the Dotcom raid video. The big benefit Mega offers is security, says Kumar, which appeals to lawyers, financial advisors, and other people whose major concern is client confidentiality. They want privacy, and Mega provides.

Source: Guardian

Recommended Videos

The Escapist is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission.Ā Learn more about our Affiliate Policy