Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

EA Rethinks Its Launch Strategy

This article is over 5 years old and may contain outdated information

Electronic Arts devalues the games it publishes. Whether it be frequent studio closures or excessive in-game monetization via microtransactions and lootboxes, bad business practices are the norm for EA, and the company doesnā€™t seem to be changing anytime soon. EAā€™s most recent get rich quick scheme is its commitment to live services, restricting some of game content behind a paywall to create a lucrative year-long revenue stream at the expense of delivering a complete artistic piece.

Recommended Videos

But as with most get rich quick schemes, this one is far from a guaranteed success. Anthemā€™s sales failed to meet expectations EA said in its fourth quarter earnings call (reported via PC Gamer) that it wants to alter the release style of its live service offerings.

ā€œThe reality is, itā€™s not just an EA challenge, itā€™s an industry-wide challenge,ā€ CEO Andrew Wison said while referencing Anthem during the earnings call. ā€œYouā€™re moving from what was initially a BioWare game which would be somewhere between 40 and 80 hours of offline play to 40 to 80 hours of offline play plus 100 or 200, 300 hours of elder game [endgame] that happens with millions of other players at scale, online.ā€

Wilson further emphasized the concept of a ā€œsoft launchā€ when releasing games with live service components. ā€œAs games have gotten bigger, that system isnā€™t working as well as it has done in years gone by,ā€ Wilson said. ā€œSo what you should expect from us is that itā€™s not just about changing development processes in the game, itā€™s not just about changing the QA process in the game ā€” although both of those things are being changed dramatically inside our organization right now ā€” but it also comes down to changing how we launch gamesā€¦ You should expect that weā€™ll start to test things like soft launches ā€” the same things that you see in the mobile space right now. And it also comes down to changing how we communicate with players. Our marketing organization now is moving out of presentation mode and into conversation mode, and changing how we interact with players over time.ā€

Wilson said this endeavor will help improve not just EA but the industry. ā€œWe think weā€™re in a really good position for this ā€” I think this gets really hard if you donā€™t have [the] scale to do this, and so we feel very good about it,ā€ he said. ā€œAnd over time, we hope that we can lead from the front and help other developers and publishers change the way they do things as well.ā€

Thatā€™s a lot to unpack, so letā€™s start by kicking Anthem while itā€™s down. Wilson described BioWareā€™s dullest flight simulator as having ā€œ40-80 hours of offline play plus 100 or 200, 300 hours of [endgame]ā€ which is just nonsense. There is no offline play due to the always online requirement If I wasnā€™t reviewing the damn game, I wouldā€™ve quit before the third hour. The issue with Anthem wasnā€™t the way in which it launched, though server problems and disconnections were definitely a problem.. But the real issue was the lack of engaging gameplay and story. For a supposed live service, Anthem wasnā€™t very lively.

Anthem was a glorified tech demo. The idea that the launch could have gone further if Anthem was simultaneously released like a mobile game via a soft launch is insulting to those who played the game or are still praying for there to be a fix months after release. Customers who pay full price for a premium game should get something high quality.

This approach doesnā€™t bode well for many of EAā€™s prospective titles, at least for those who still view video games as a respectable artform. EAā€™s releases from the last few years like Star Wars Battlefront II or any EA Sports title donā€™t inspire confidence there are few confirmed titles this year. Save for the promise of the single player Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order, there isnā€™t much to look forward to. Even BioWareā€™s rumored Dragon Age 4 wonā€™t benefit from EAā€™s live service shakeup.

Maybe Washington will regulate the exploitative nature of live services and wind up making video game better. Otherwise Electronic Arts should reconsider if itā€™s still in the business of making electronic art at all.


The Escapist is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission.Ā Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Riley Constantine
Riley Constantine
Contributor. Riley Constantine is Iowa's third greatest export behind Slipknot and life insurance. She loves to review movies and games while examining how they often mirror the bizarre world we live in.