āOh, Lord itās hard to be humble, but Iām doing the best I can.ā ā Mac Davis
Itās hard to be humble, if youāre Bungie. In just over 10 years, the company has produced over a dozen games, sold an estimated 14 million units, created one of the best-selling game franchises on any platform and single-handedly saved Microsoftās fledgling Xbox console from an early grave.
This week Bungie releases the much-anticipated capstone to the Halo trilogy, a game thatās sold more copies before it has even hit the shelves than most titles will sell all year. Speaking to Bungie, itās clear the voodoo they do isnāt exactly magic, per se, but a strenuous application of talent and skill to the art of making games, and not even the current kings of console gaming get it right every time.
But thatās not what plagues Bungie. Releasing a successful game would appear to be second nature to the one-time Macintosh game developer turned Microsoft in-house ace. No, what keeps the minds behind Halo up at night is the difficulty of remaining humble ā and focused.
āWe donāt want to get too arrogant,ā Bungie Community Lead Brian Jarrard told The Escapist. āWe occasionally worry that we donāt want [Halo 3] to get over-hyped. Thatās not something we do. We donāt go out and say, āThis game is the Second Coming; it will be the biggest thing ever.ā I think it very likely can and might be, but weāre just happy that this is a great piece of work that weāve put a lot of time and effort into, and this represents the best Halo game weāve made, and [itās] a fitting conclusion to this trilogy.ā
And āfitting conclusionā is exactly what Halo fans will be looking for when the game ships this week. The first Halo stood fairly well on its own. In fact, it could have survived quite well as the only installment of Halo, except for the niggling fact it sold millions of copies (more than all of Bungieās previous games combined). The second game, however, did not fare so well.
āA Real, Proper Endingā
The forum at halo2boards.com tells the story:
āEveryoneā¦.How disapointing was that ending..OMG!!! I think Bungie is trying to lead us on unto false hopes to a Halo 3..i swear why..they had three years and a half to make a great campaign..and then we get this a letdown endingā¦pleaseā¦i hope bungie burns in hellā ā elite13
Are you completely insane?!? the ending was a complete waste of my time! and sequal?!? this one was disapointing enough!!
Bungie has one more chance to redeem themselves if they make another sequal it better be good or i aint buyin anything else ā big chief
āLooking back on Halo 2,ā Jarrard says, āthe most glaring omission was a real, proper ending to the game. When that game began, it was never intended to just stop. We definitely didnāt intend to just yank the carpet out.ā
But they did. Oh, did they, and the fans werenāt the only ones who noticed. According to Wiredās Lore Sjƶberg, the game ends not with a bang, but with āa sad little squeak.ā
āAnd if you try to anticipate the most disappointing, anticlimactic ending possible,ā he writes, āthereās at least a 50-50 chance it wonāt be as bad as you expect.ā
āThat was a result of us as a team going through some growing pains and not really doing a fantastic job of producing and planning properly,ā Jarrard says. āAnd as a result we had to make some changes to the project mid-stream.ā
Simply put, in spite of the fact both Myth and Marathon were wildly successful Mac games, they were still Mac games. And garnering accolades in an industry niche is as different from the blockbuster console game market as the local high school talent show is from Broadway. The difference for Bungie was night and day. Along with smashing success came a handful of problems for the once-tiny, once-independent game studio.
āWe knew we could do better [on Halo 2],ā says Jarrard. āThe real reason that things went awry for us was a lack of really disciplined production. When Microsoft acquired Bungie, Halo 1 was sort of half-done, half-developed and at that point it was taking a really soft concept and applying it to the Xbox.ā Developing a sequel guaranteed to be as successful as the original was a completely different ballgame.
Itās no secret Microsoft needed a boost from Bungie for their 2004 Holiday season (and they got it ā with Halo 2ās help, Microsoft sold over 6 million consoles in 2004), but an anxious publisher can often spell disaster for a creative studio, rushing a game into production before itās ready. Jarrard, however, doesnāt blame Microsoft for Halo 2ās flaws. Instead, he describes Bungieās working relationship with Microsoft as a ābest of both worldsā situation.
āThere is pressure that we feel coming out of Redmond, but in a lot of ways weāre in a really good situation here,ā he says. āAfter Halo 2 shipped, Microsoft allowed us to move out of Redmond, and we moved into a custom building. ā¦ Weāre basically inside a bubble. We have our own building, our own security, our own infrastructure. Weāre very much insulated from the day-to-day corporate structure of the massive Microsoft company.
āThey had already come to the conclusion that [Halo 2] was going to be done when it was going to be done. Obviously, we canāt [develop] forever, but they were definitely flexible and didnāt force us to kick the game out. ā¦ They didnāt want to put a gun to our heads.ā
Instead, Jarrard says, the problem was one almost every game company faces and few survive: entropy. āFor Halo 2, the ideas were huge, the stuff we wanted to do was huge,ā he says. āOne of our initial pains was we set our sights too high for the technology. About a year and a half into the project we realized we were going to have to make some significant changes.ā
The changes involved almost every aspect of the game, including an extensive story re-write, and in the end, there just wasnāt enough time left to actually, you know, finish the game. So they cheated a bit, polished what they could and drew a line at the furthest possible point, which wasnāt quite as far into the story as most fans would have liked. Nevertheless, in spite of bringing new meaning to āwhen itās done,ā the game still sold over 8 million copies, and Bungie learned a valuable lesson.
āTo put it in perspective, when Halo 2 shipped, we had three full-time producers,ā says Jarrard. āAt last count, we have roughly 12 or so. That was one of our biggest takeaways: We need to treat production as a discipline in the same way that we treat art, engineering and design. We need to get better at it, hire some people that are excellent at it and we need to really understand how to work more efficiently as a group.ā
āI Fucking Cannot Play Halo 2ā
Two games into the franchise ā and an entire platform saved from irrelevance ā it looked to all the world as if Bungie could do no wrong. Even the much-maligned non-ending to the Halo sequel had, a year or so after its release, become merely a fleeting annoyance tolerated both by long-time fans of the series and new recruits, largely because of the gameās long legs in the multiplayer community. And then the unthinkable happened: One of Bungieās own broke ranks.
āEven the multiplayer experience for Halo 2 is a pale shadow of what it could and should have been if we had gotten the timing of our schedule right,ā Bungieās Technical Lead, Chris Butcher, told Edge magazine in January of 2007. ā Itās astounding to me. I fucking cannot play Halo 2 multiplayer. I cannot do it.ā
Butcher wasnāt the only one who was dissatisfied.
āWe drove off [a cliff] Thelma & Louise style,ā said writer Frank OāConnor, saying the experience of working on Halo 2 was akin to āwriting by committee.ā
The damage control began almost immediately, but in retrospect, Bungie has embraced the criticism. āWeāve got a group of guys here that are all extreme perfectionists and sometimes maybe to a fault,ā Jarrard says. āObviously Halo 2 was a great game, but for these guys who spent three years slaving away on it, itās really hard for them [emotionally] to look back and see [the rough edges].
āGoing into Halo 3, we wanted to right those wrongs. Weāve had the luxury of learning from our mistakes, so weāre not going to find ourselves in that position [again]. The main things we really did differently this time around was we really did a strong job of pre-production. Almost every thing we set out to accomplish is exactly what we intend to ship. I donāt believe thereās anyone in this building whoās truly unhappy with [Halo 3].ā
āA Pretty Good Startā
It would seem, at first glance, that itās 2004 all over again. Again, the holiday season approaches, again Microsoft needs a system-seller to push their new console and again all eyes are on Bungie and Halo. But with one colossal, successful failure and several years experience behind them, Bungie seems poised to redeem themselves in the eyes of their hardcore fans and finish the Halo trilogy with an actual bang; more so, perhaps, for themselves than for anyone else.
āA lot of the pressure to make Halo 3 succeed comes from within our own building,ā
Jarrard says.
One thing that hasnāt changed this time around, though, is the buzz. Halo-branded soft drinks have been flying off store shelves. Halo 3 is set to release on September 25 at midnight. Almost every store that sells games has announced a midnight sale, even 7-Eleven. Whether the game is what everyone hoped or not, itās already a hit.
āWeāve already announced that we have over a million pre-orders,ā says Jarrard, āso I think weāre off to a pretty good start.ā
But for Bungie, itās all something out of some sort of dream. A really good dream, where they make videogames people love, but still, a dream. āI think the success of the franchise has taken a lot of us by surprise,ā he says. āWe honestly didnāt think it would take off in the way it has.
āMost of us here try to stay grounded and do what we do best ā the artists want to make great art, the programmers want to create great AI and good physics. The designers want to create great gameplay experiences. As long as we feel weāve put our best foot forward and made the best game we can possibly make, thatās going to be enough to keep us pushing forward. Luckily so far what works for us also seems to work for the mainstream public, so weāve been able to hit on both fronts.ā
āThe Guys That Make Haloā
Everyone who achieves greatness must, at some time or another, face the possibility that theyāve peaked, and they are now entering a time when everything that follows will be āless greatā than their masterwork. Click through the lineup of VH-1 reality shows for a few classic examples of this phenomenon.
Naturally then, Bungie, at the pinnacle of their success, must begin thinking about the future, about life after Halo, and whether or not theyāve still got it.
āWe canāt continue to be a studio that cranks out one Halo game every three years,ā says Jarrard. āThatās not something weāre going to be able to sustain, and itās not going to keep our people challenged and invested in doing great work. Itās safe to assume weāre going to have some downloadable content to keep our community satisfied and keep the game fresh over time. [But] beyond that weāve always got a group of people thinking about what the next big game is going to be, and that could be something thatās not Halo at all.ā
The prospect of willingly walking away from the goose and its golden eggs must be equal parts thrilling and terrifying, and if youāre Bungie, the company who once made a name for themselves making daring, original games for the tiniest sliver of the computer gaming market, itās a no-brainer. But then again, they do have that rich uncle to worry about.
āI donāt think Halo 3 marks the end of Halo for Bungie,ā says Jarrard. āHowever, we do have some people on the team who have been working on the Halo franchise for over 10 years now, and as much as they love it and as far as itās come, theyāre really hungry to figure out whatās next. We donāt want to only be known as the guys that make Halo.ā
Russ Pitts is an Associate Editor for The Escapist. His blog can be found at www.falsegravity.com.
Published: Sep 25, 2007 5:16 PM UTC