Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

Michael Myers Is Perfectly Evil

This article is over 6 years old and may contain outdated information

Michael Myers is a horror icon. Heā€™s the template for psycho killers, those masked fellas intent on ruining teensā€™ good times and racking up double-digit body counts. Think of anything associated with a slasher movie and Michael likely did it first. And yet who is he, really? Those who followed him cracked wise or wore their motivations like bloody badges of honor, but Michael has remained quiet and mysterious for 40 years, which is exactly why heā€™s still so fascinating.

Recommended Videos

The new Halloween is a direct sequel to John Carpenterā€™s original masterpiece (H78), effectively rendering anything that came after it in the franchise moot. For the most part, thatā€™s a good choice, not only because it explains how Michael recovered from being beheaded in Halloween H20: 20 Years Later, but also because most of the sequels are flat-out terrible.

The others either fail to understand Michaelā€™s truth or just abandon it completely. (The weirdest departure is most certainly Halloween III: Season of the Witch, which has nothing at all to do with Michael or Laurie Strode, instead centering on a conspiracy to use chips of Stonehenge to kill children via rubber masks. Itā€™s great fun, you should watch it.) Other entries either give us new protagonists, retcon the Halloween mythology, or both, in an understandable but misguided, attempt to keep the franchise churning out cash for as long as possible. Ā 

Rob Zombieā€™s take on Michael in 2007ā€™s Halloween is admittedly more modern and in some ways more interesting, attempting to give him a humanity that none of the other films really ever provided. Michaelā€™s tenure in the asylum was glossed over in H78, giving Zombie the opportunity to explore it fully in his own film without trampling over sacred ground. Michael still emerges as a monster, but a somewhat sympathetic monster who was doomed from the start.

There is plenty of room to pity Zombieā€™s version of Michael Myers, but letā€™s be honest: we donā€™t want to pity Michael or empathize with him. We donā€™t want to see things from his perspective. He is, as the very first Halloween makes clear, the boogeyman: an unknowable, unstoppable force of pure evil. Imagining he wouldā€™ve been fine if heā€™d been hugged a bit more ruins part of his appeal.

When we talk about Michael Myers, we mean something very specific: a knife-wielding figure in a mask striding silently but inexorably toward the death of Laurie Strode. Which is why Iā€™m disappointed that Halloween II is no longer part of official canon. In H78, Michael is fixated on Laurie as soon as he spies her through the broken windows of his childhood home, but itā€™s never clear exactly why. Halloween II created a reason for Michaelā€™s obsession that, while not strictly necessary, made sense based on facts established in the original film.

Our introduction to Michael in H78 is him murdering his older sister when heā€™s a six-year-old child dressed up for Halloween. We see his perspective through the eye holes of his clown mask as he stabs her again and again with a butcherā€™s knife. Heā€™s immediately consigned to an asylum, where Dr. Samuel Loomis spends eight years trying to reach him, and then seven years trying to keep him locked up because heā€™d realized, as he puts it, there was nothing behind Michaelā€™s eyes but ā€œpure evil.ā€

That bit is important. Weā€™ll come back to it.

In Halloween II, we discover that Laurie was Michaelā€™s baby sister, removed from the family after that first bloody Halloween and eventually adopted by the Strode family. The action of the first movie now holds greater significance. Having offed one sister, Michael breaks out of the asylum where heā€™s been stuck for more than a decade on Halloween night and heads back to his hometown to finish off the other. We never really know why, nor do we need to. He wants his remaining sister dead and wonā€™t stop until she is.

The why is irrelevant. We want the why to matter, but the truth is far more terrifying than any complex sequence of events that might have driven Michael mad. With the will and determination of a child, Michael wants. Children, as any parent will confirm, want what they want for reasons only they can fully understand and with a ferocity that is undeniable and unshakeable. At some point in his young life ā€” perhaps only moments before putting on his clown mask that Halloween night ā€” Michael decided he wanted to kill his sister. So thatā€™s exactly what he did.

The simplicity of Michael Myersā€™ character is chilling because it leaves no room for reason, discussion, or logic. And now we come back to why itā€™s so important that Dr. Loomis was working to keep Michael locked up. If Michael was insane, the possibility would exist that he might someday be returned to some version of sanity and become recognizable as a human being. If he was broken, he might someday be fixed. But Michael isnā€™t broken. He is exactly as he is meant to be: evil.

Michael Myers is evil made flesh, a walking well of darkness with ā€œthe devilā€™s eyes.ā€ Nothing about his physical appearance is at all remarkable. His mask is vaguely masculine, his jumpsuit nondescript. He doesnā€™t speak. His walk is methodical, but not distinctive. He kills dispassionately, with whatever method is convenient in the moment. He is unhurried and calm.

And that is why Michael is so perfect. Evil ā€” true evil, not just people being shitty to each other ā€” is unassuming and quiet. It is elegant in its simplicity. It wants to corrupt and destroy, not because it is angry or vengeful, but because that is its purpose. It is pure. Just like Michael.


The Escapist is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission.Ā Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author