Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

Red Faction: Armageddon Review

This article is over 13 years old and may contain outdated information

The Red Faction series is known primarily for its destruction technology: the early games allowed the player to burrow holes into the landscape, and the more recent titles allow the player to dynamically bring any structure to its knees by destroying its supports. It’s a fun mechanic, and Volition has built the series around it. The problem with Red Faction: Armageddon, however, is that they didn’t build the game around it.

Fans of the previous game will quickly notice that the open world of Red Faction: Guerrilla has been replaced with a more linear, structured experience. This has a few ramifications, but their intention was to deliver a more consistent stream of action and have more control over the presentation of the story. They succeeded on both counts, though the latter may have been a wasted effort.

You, as Darius Mason, were tricked by the nefarious cultist/terrorist Adam Hale into unleashing an alien scourge on the unsuspecting populace of Mars, and now it’s up to you to save them. There are some other bits to it – Hale has also blown up the Terraformer, forcing everyone into tunnels underground – but they’re lost in a sea of mediocre cutscenes and unpleasant characters. While not offensively bad, the story exists mostly as a vessel to justify your back-talking supersoldier’s genocide. Volition, however, considered it important enough to liberally place cutscenes throughout the game which are, thankfully, skippable. Additionally, they’ve released an accompanying film, Red Faction: Origins, which supposedly bridges the story between the previous title and Armageddon, but it’s easy to follow the plotline of Armageddon even if you’ve never played the previous games. Overall, the story is on par with the rest of the genre, which isn’t saying much, but it does a serviceable job of setting up the action.

Before I can discuss the action, though, it’s important to note that Armageddon features aliens as the predominant enemy – a first for the series. These bug-like monstrosities have crawled from the bowels of Mars to attack the upstanding human citizens (never mind that the majority of your encounters with other humans involve being shot at, deceived, or arrested) who now occupy the planet, and it’s clear that they must be destroyed – after all, we were here first they started it we don’t like they way they look. There are a few different types of these chitinous buggers, and each one has a different attack pattern: leaping aliens, jumping wall-sticking aliens, teleporting aliens, charging aliens, and so on. Almost all of them have some form of quick, agile movement to make shooting them more challenging. The attack patterns are recognizably different from one another, each alien type is easily identifiable, and the combination of different alien types prevents combat from becoming stale. The enemy design, considered alone, is skillfully done.

Red Faction series is always about its Geo-Mod technology, which allows most structures to be destroyed dynamically by blowing their supporting components apart. It’s impressive to see in action, and it holds the same primal satisfaction that comes from knocking down an intricate Lego construction without the accompanying guilt of making a child cry. It has tactical implications, too: buildings can be denied to the enemy, chasms can be made impassible by the destruction of their bridges, new entrances can be made in fortified enemy bunkers, and so forth. Volition has equipped the player with a number of weapons to facilitate the destruction, some new to the series and some classic holdovers, all of which are distinct and entertaining to use.

Armageddon has all the pieces necessary to make a great game – so why isn’t it one?

Recommended Videos

The problem lies not in the individual components – each of which, taken on their own, are enjoyable – but in the composition of the whole. Different gameplay elements actively undermine each other. While the new Nano Forge powers, which range from damage buffs to AOE attacks, are fun, ammunition is so plentiful that conserving it is never an issue, meaning the player can use the (usually more versatile and effective) weapons without restraint, negating the need for the Forge. For the same reason, ammunition limits on weapons mean little; you may as well continuously use the weapon with which you can kill the fastest. This takes away any meaningful choice in weapon selection and use – I completed much of the game using only the assault rifle and charge (grenade) launcher, switching to other weapons for no reason other than because I was bored of my present loadout.

Most egregious, however, is the way the aliens invalidate any meaningful use of the Geo-Mod technology. Sure, you can blow up a bridge, but why would you? The aliens will simply pounce across; the only person inconvenienced by the loss of the bridge is you. You can knock a tower on its side, splitting the enemy forces in half, but what good is that when the aliens will simply leap or crawl over the rubble without effort? How you choose to attack has no real meaning; no matter what you do, aliens will converge on you from all angles. The only reason to destroy buildings is to collect the salvage points they leave behind, which is a cheap and artificial way of getting the players to use the technology – it adds no depth and would be effectively the same game without destructible buildings, except you’d spend less time running around already-cleared levels, blowing up everything in sight to collect their treasures.

Likewise, the game advises you to use your Nano Forge to rebuild cover during a firefight, but why bother? The only time you need cover that desperately is when you’re either surrounded, making cover useless, or when you’re being attacked by a weapon large enough to destroy your cover immediately after rebuilding it. Besides, dodging is an easier way to avoid harm long enough to regenerate your health fully. You’re occasionally required to use the Forge for one of two purposes: either to rebuild a plot device, which is functionally identical to pulling a lever (hold down the correct button for a moment and the object is rebuilt), or to rebuild destroyed (either by design or by you) structures needed to continue, such as a bridge or walkway, which adds nothing to the game except requiring you to hold down the rebuild button while moving. It’s a shame the technology is wasted this way, because puzzles involving the Forge could have been both interesting and a nice break from the constant gunfire of the rest of the game.

What’s left is a game almost without decisions. It doesn’t really matter if you destroy the buildings, it doesn’t really matter what weapon you choose to use, and it doesn’t really matter how you approach the encounters. The only thing that does matter is your ability to aim and dodge.

But you know what? Those parts are actually pretty good. Combat feels right. and there is a sensation of impact when your hammer makes contact with an alien’s torso or your boot comes smashing down on a bug; better still is punching one with the L.E.O.’s mechanically augmented fist, causing the creature to outright explode in a shower of gore. Each gun is distinct and fun to use (though not all are equal in power), the aiming feels right, and the enemies die easily enough to impart a satisfying sense of power to the player while being numerous enough to occasionally be dangerous.

Red Faction: Armageddon is not a bad game; it’s simply a confused game. At its core is a solid (if simplistic) third-person reflex shooter, and a good one, too. The problem is that everything about the game undermines its primary selling point, the Geo-Mod destruction, leaving behind a product that fails to reach even a fraction of its potential.

Bottom Line: Red Faction: Armageddon is a polished and satisfying reflex shooter that removes meaningful decisions from the game and trivializes its own greatest technology.

Recommendation: If you like the challenge of rapid aiming and dodging, you could do a lot worse than Armageddon, but if you like using destruction creatively to solve problems, you should look elsewhere.

[rating=3]

This review is based on the Xbox 360 version.

What our review scores mean.

Game: Red Faction: Armageddon
Genre: Action
Developer: Volition
Publisher: THQ, SyFy Games
Platform(s): PC, PS3, Xbox360
Available from: Amazon(US), GameStop(US), Play.com(UK)

imageimageimage


The Escapist is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission.Ā Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author