At this point the most boring but also undeniably correct observation you can make in film criticism is that Phil Lord and Chris Miller are uniquely skilled at turning what ought to be the tackiest commercially motivated movie projects into actually good films. They do so not through subversion but in a way that sincerely elevates and indeed embraces their very commerciality.
When you think about it, thereās almost an element of the sinister to their ability: It shouldnāt be possible for normal humans to be this good at what is essentially emotion-driven brand marketing. You shouldnāt be able to so successfully turn the LEGO corporationās self-serving feel good projected image as a vessel for imagination, self-expression, and intergenerational family togetherness into the actual moral through line of The LEGO Movie. At a certain point, a crack should start to show and natural cynicism should take over. āWait a minute! This is exactly how a company that wants me to fork over money for more of their bricks would want me to feel about them!ā The spell should break, but it doesnāt because the movie is that good.
Another thing you probably shouldnāt be able to do is actually make a proper sequel to The LEGO Movie, since it seemed like such a miracle that the original worked as well as it did in the first place. A sequel should also be impossible because (in case you forgot) the first one wrapped up with a uniquely ingenious reality-bending twist that rendered the āstakesā of the main storyās action less than life or death, and further established that its universe was so malleable that sequels could be beside the point. They told what seems to be the story and communicated the message of the property in terms of the framework theyād built for themselves, right?
To be certain: The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part starts out buried (quite literally) under an awareness of OUR awareness of its own sequel stature. It openly plays with the audienceās understanding of what the rules of the scenario are supposed to be now. The sequelās perspective is meant to keep you guessing within a plot that turns out to be making a big thematic swing instead of a reality-shift this time around. Thereās also one of those, in a manner of speaking, though itās different from the first movieās twist.
Itās been five years since the climax of the first film and the āto be continuedā ending has left the self-contained LEGO universe inhabited by the main characters stratified into a state of war between two states. Thereās the mysterious Sistar System ā alien invaders who have apparently pillaged the world of its more whimsical pieces ā and the remaining inhabitants of what is now Apocalypsburg, a biting sendup of gritty adolescent angst pop culture fixations where everyone but original movie hero Emmet has gone all Mad Max.
When the principal characters from the original are themselves abducted by a mysterious Sistar emissary, Emmett heads out to rescue them. Heās doomed to fail until he allies with new character Rex Dangervest. With both characters voiced by Chris Pratt itās a sendup of Prattās current blockbuster movie persona and how it compliments Emmettās callback to the actorās time on Parks and Recreation. Meanwhile, the other characters encounter a mysterious shapeshifting Sistar space queen whose agenda and purpose are something of a massive spoiler, save to note that sheās memorably voiced by Tiffany Haddish and gets two utterly hilarious musical numbers.
To actually describe how this all gets resolved would, unfortunately, give away the game. Suffice to say if The Second Part isnāt ultimately as rock solid a construction as its predecessor itās only because itās going for a MUCH bigger, more narratively complex denouement than the original. You might not expect an extended Madeleine LāEngle reference to just get dropped into the midst of a questing sequence and yet thatās what happens here. The movie ends up asking the audience to do a bit more heavy lifting in terms of sorting out what various events in āLEGO Worldā are supposed to represent vis-a-vis both ārealityā and āsubconscious inner monologue of characters in reality.ā
It wouldnāt surprise me if the actual mechanics of the ābig revealā end up utterly perplexing to the youngest in the audience. Even this ostensible adult didnāt expect to spend several minutes of a LEGO movie trying to work out which of these two characters who are both technically supposed to be imaginary is physically present, and which is being wholly imagined in order to serve as an extension of the otherās existential crisis?
The more winkingly obvious mystery object naming scheme this time makes it easy to figure out that weāre heading for a condemnation of adolescent āgrittyā machismo with the same stern-but-gentle finger wag given to fussy stifled adulthood in the original. Still, this means the film ends up asking the younger side of the franchiseās two-tiered audience to be the introspective ones this time. How often do you see that?
Complicated or not, the movie does (if youāll pardon the pun) eventually all fit together. As ever the animation and sight gags are gorgeous and the cast is uniformly terrific. Who knows how much gas the franchise can truly be said to have in it? But then before the original no one thought this was a franchise in the first place.
Published: Feb 8, 2019 12:00 pm