Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

Viacom Takes Harmonix Shareholders to Court for Millions of Dollars

This article is over 13 years old and may contain outdated information
image

Harmonix’s former parent company says that it paid out over a hundred million dollars to shareholders more than it should have.

It’s been brewing for a while, but Viacom has sued the shareholders of Harmonix, the music game studio it formerly owned, in an effort to get back a very large chunk – nearly 90% – of the $150 million in bonuses it paid out in 2007.

According to the suit, the $150 million was based on a “preliminary calculation” for performance-based bonuses on the Rock Band series. These calculations apparently turned out to be very, very wrong, and the actual amount owed in bonuses was around $18 million. Viacom wants to have the difference, around $131 million, refunded to it. This won’t come as a complete surprise to the Harmonix shareholders; Viacom first put forward the idea it might have overpaid over 18 months ago in a SEC filing.

Interestingly, Harmonix shareholders sued Viacom late last year for the opposite reason. The Harmonix suit alleged that the shareholders hadn’t been paid enough, and Viacom was withholding performance bonuses for 2008. The shareholder’s suit also said that Viacom manipulated payments and profits to minimize the amount bonuses it would have to pay out. The shareholders’ suit is currently in the hands of a resolution accountant.

It’s not for me to say who’s right and who’s wrong here; both sides clearly think they have a case, or they wouldn’t have sued in the first place. Considering the opposing goals of the two cases, it’s hard to see the two sides coming to a deal.

Source: Gamasutra

Recommended Videos

The Escapist is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission.Ā Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author